Bill for Battery Point bell project now stands at £18,000

Profile image for Prue_Reid

By Prue_Reid | Thursday, January 31, 2013, 17:36

A PROJECT to display a former lighthouse bell in the centre of Portishead has already cost the taxpayer £18,000.

The bronze bell, which used to hang in the lighthouse at Battery Point, has been installed on the central reservation at Wyndham Way.

The project has been led by Portishead Town Council and it was revealed this week that the costs so far stand at £18,000 –which has been found out of council funds.

The bronze bell, which weighs two tonnes, used to hang in the lighthouse and automatically sound to warn sailors travelling along the Bristol Channel of treacherous weather conditions.

It was put in the lighthouse when it was built in 1931 but removed 12 years ago because of concerns surrounding the structural strength of the lighthouse.

The town council paid £1 for the bell after local residents Annette Hennessy and Carol Thomas  tracked it down to a dusty warehouse at Portbury Docks.

Councillors were keen to see the bell put on display and initially earmarked £2,500 to spend on architects and planning permission fees.

A number of locations for the bell were considered, including the Folk Hall and library, before a decision was taken to put it on display at Wyndham Way.

Councillors then agreed to earmark a further £12,000 to build a special concrete, granite and steel structure for the bell to hang on.

The town council has also had to foot the bill for additional surveys, including one on the water pipes below the site which is understood to have cost several hundred pounds.

A tree survey has also had to be carried out, at the request of North Somerset Council and the bell had to be insured, adding to the costs

But over the months the cost of the projects have continued to rise and now the bill stands at £18,000.

.Councillors are now concerned that the final cost of the bell project could reach as much as £20,000 with maintenance and cleaning bills in the future.

Money for the project was taken out of reserves from the council's environmental, cultural, heritage and allotment budget.

Some councillors raised concerns about the costs at the start of the project, fearful that funds were being spent when other services were being cut as a result of sweeping austerity measures.

Councillor David Pasley said: "When you add together everything which has been spent on this project, it is a large amount of money,

"I think if councillors knew what the full extent of the costs of this project were likely to be at the start, then they may not have agreed to go ahead with it and found a different use for the bell.

Councillor Ros Cruse said: "I have always been against the spending of such a large amount of money on this project.

"I was never against the bell project itself, but I thought there were other places it could have been put which would have cost less.

"It now seems as if the project could cost up to £20,000."

Tweet this article
      

Comments

       
  • Profile image for The_old_goat

    Why can Portishead Town Council not get anything right ?..... First the bell was NOT a Jubilee project, it was NOT put into place during a Jubilee year, and it most certainly was NOT Portishead Town Council who erected it - This bell was returned to Portishead after two local and well respected residents found the bell and started a campaign to return it to Portishead as it was an important part of the history of our town.....

    Furthermore the two members of Portishead Town Council are now trying to distance themselves from the cost should hang their heads in shame, after all they both had a part in signing the cheques and were both in a position to challenge the costs at any stage of the process, but both chose not to do so, in fact they were part of the reason for the additional costs as they dragged their feet along the way and as usual Portishead Town Council moved at a slower pace than a snail!

    By The_old_goat at 10:16 on 03/02/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for jojomojomoto

    "Erected in the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Year 2012 by Portishead Town Council". that is the biggest outright lie of them all and they do tell a few this cannot be allowed to stay on the bell they were hardly involved lies lies lies

    By jojomojomoto at 20:12 on 02/02/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for thurti365

    Now I wonder why someone seems so sensitive to factual information that it can now only be viewed on the Posset Pie website? It is a puzzle which is unlikely to ever be solved but thankfully because Posset Pie stands for the truth, one can be assured that we need not be worried.

    The plaque to the Bell is already in place but listening to local people around it today, it would seem that even the inscription is frustrating some who saw the Bell lifted into place in January 2013 and it certainly was not in the Jubilee Year of 2012. I understand it was not even a Jubilee Project. So why does it say the following?:

    "Erected in the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Year 2012 by Portishead Town Council".

    By thurti365 at 19:10 on 02/02/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for jojomojomoto

    I have just found out that that the money for the bell came form the Heritage fund that exists solely for such projects and will have no effect on services to local people.So why all the fuss?

    By jojomojomoto at 22:23 on 01/02/13

      Report
              
     
  • Profile image for CityClarky

    The undertones suggest this could be an Alice in Wonderland 'through the looking glass' moment.

    If theres an underground movement going on, Lets be careful, GCHQ have spies.

    By CityClarky at 20:25 on 01/02/13

      Report
              
     

Show all Comments

max 4000 characters
        
   

Latest Stories in Portishead

       
      

Local Vouchers

       
   

Local Jobs

       
   

Search for...

       
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min rent is bigger than Max rent